God Aggregation

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of God information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

A monetary realist named Merrill M.E. Jenkins wrote a book called "'Money' The Greatest Hoax On Earth." Having read the book, I liked that title so much I started thinking about language, the sounds the human mouth is capable of uttering, and the use of other dual-meaning words -- such as "God", "law", "government", "religion", etc. -- designed to confuse ignorant, gullible and naive people, (especially working-class people) so wannabe clever "political class" criminals can steal their labor without the victims realizing what was going on. That's when it occurred to me that the word "money" is not the greatest hoax on Earth. I would argue that words such as "God", "law", "government", and "religion" are even greater hoax words than "money", with "God" being arguably the greatest hoax word of all. Let's look at it.

ShareThis

Law Aggregation

in

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of law information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

"Law" is another one of those so-unspecific-as-to-be-useless-for-anything-but-obfuscation-and-manipulation dual-purpose deception-based words such as "God", "government", "religion", "money", etc. The key to understanding these obfuscatory dual-purpose (i.e. good-evil) words is being able to recognize the difference between when they are being used to mean self-ownership and when they are being used to mean feudalistic "government" ownership/control over B by A. In other words, does "law" mean that you own yourself, your labor, and the produce of your labor? Or does "law" mean I (or some group of "politicians") get to run your life and you have to do what I say?

ShareThis

Government Aggregation

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of government information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

In reality, there is no such real thing as "government". It is not a rock, a tree, a river, or even a cloud. It is mere behavior, an established social order, a dominance-based pecking order. With other animal species, it is often called "dominance hierarchy". In the case of humans, the term "social hierarchy" is more often used. As Frédéric Bastiat said, "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." As H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." As General Smedley Butler has written, "War Is A Racket". In reality, "government" is merely the dominant individuals in the inherently evil and inevitably corrupting stupid-human pecking order struggle known as "politics". These disordered-by-definition dominant individuals merely call themselves "government" so the hoi polloi masses will view them as being intelligent enough and moral enough to follow and obey.

ShareThis

Politics Aggregation

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of politics information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

Always remember, "politics" = person or group A trying to persuade person or group B to obey the will of A, most frequently for the personal financial benefit of A and to the personal financial detriment (higher taxes) of B. In other words, "politics" = manipulation. That's all it is. That is why deception = the so-called "art" of politics. That is also why "politician" = professional deceiver/manipulator, and why "political" = deception-based, manipulation-based, and/or having to do with deception and/or manipulation.

ShareThis

Language Aggregation

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of language information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

According to Phonetics: The Sounds of Language, by Michael Dobrovolsky and Francis Katamba, "a very wide range of sounds is found in human language (600 consonants and 200 vowels, according to one estimate)." That's a lot of sounds!

ShareThis

Ralph D'Andrea -- R.I.P. -- 1949 - 2014

Ralph D'Andrea, a good man whom I considered to be a friend, passed away Friday, November 7, 2014.

I'm 70, so it came as a bit of a surprise to open the local newspaper over my usual morning cup of green tea and discover a 65-year-old friend's obituary. I'm told by friends older than I that such events happen with greater frequency the older one gets.

As noted in his obituary, Ralph ran the Junction Daily Blog for years. He started it on a its own website at "wwwdotjunctiondailyblogdotcom", which was for a time linked to the Daily Sentinel, then, after some kind of disagreement -- my guess is it was probably over content -- Ralph moved it to Facebook, where it is still online as of this writing. I hope his wife, Cheryl, leaves it up for posterity.

For several years, I taught music to Ralph and Cheryl's daughter, Carina Louise D'Andrea. Like everyone else, I suppose, I was shocked by Carina's (everybody I knew called her "Cari") untimely death. In the circle of life, parents are supposed to die before their children, not the other way around. I'm sure Ralph was heart-broken by Cari's passing.

ShareThis

Revolution Aggregation

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of information about revolution: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

One of the very first things a freedom fighter must understand is what the government1 says you can speak/write, and what the government says you are not allowed to speak/write. In other words, where is the constitutional boundary line between so-called "protected" speech and "unprotected" speech? In America, the U.S. Supreme Court has frequently acknowledged that it was the Founders' clear intent to protect political2 speech above all other types of speech. For example, two important free speech cases which bear on the essay are Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) (unanimous court), and Meyer v Grant, 486 US 414 (1988) (unanimous court). The case of Yates v. U.S., 354 U.S. 298 (1957) holds that "advocacy and teaching of forcible overthrow of government AS ABSTRACT PRINCIPLE is immune from prosecution." Regarding “sedition3”, compare Pennsylvania v. Nelson, 350 U.S. 497 (1956) dissent to Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) (unanimous court).

ShareThis

Fasting Aggregation

“You must be the change you want to see in the world.” ~ Mohandas K. Gandhi

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of fasting information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

ShareThis

New Citizen Media v. Old Vestigial Dinosaur Media -- How to out-compete your local "Good Old Boys"

By John Wilkenson

(NOTE: There are many text/links in this essay. They look grey, but if you put your cursor on them, they become underlined so you can see them to click on them. All of the banner/links also take you to a destination URL.)

The Vestigial Dinosaur Media (VDM) is rapidly approaching extinction. Digital technology has bypassed chopping trees to make newspapers. Internet technology has taken the money out of politics by allowing you to send a multi-page message to thousands of people all around the world in a sixtieth of second for a sixth of a cent. To get information out to the public in real time, it is no longer necessary to own a multi-million-dollar building with a multi-million-dollar press, a multi-million-dollar payroll and scores of employees. One pajama-clad blogger typing away in his mother's basement can even the playing field by using websites and social media.

The Hegelian VDM serves Power (over the Other) and tries to make a living by "managing the news", perpetuating delusional social divisions -- (e.g. black v. white, women v. men, haves v. have nots, young v. old, ad infitum) -- and moulding your opinions. I fight against Power (over the Other) and don't try to "manage" the news. Like Matt Drudge, I just "retweet" the news and let you decide whether or not to read it. Of course, I do use #hashtags to target demographics to which my retweets go. Hyperlink technology lets citizen journalists like me use whole books and videos as footnotes to spread information and empower the individual for free. In today's high-tech playing field, the tree-chopping VDM is sort of like a one-legged man in a butt-kicking contest.

ShareThis

Why I'm voting for Pat Arotin -- Part 2

By John Wilkenson

(NOTE: To see an update in events, please scroll down to "UPDATE" below. There are many text/links in this essay. They look blue, but if you put your cursor on them, they become underlined so you can see them to click on them. All of the banner/links also take you to a destination URL.)

If I told you I was voting for Pat Arotin not only because of what I consider to be an over-the-top Daily Sentinel editorial but also what I suspect are dirty tricks from the Matt Lewis camp, you might say, "What?! Say it ain't so, Joe!" So let's look at it.

Yesterday, Mesa County Sheriff's Department (MCSD) "Information & Communications Manager", Heather Benjamin (above right), sent me what I consider to be an inappropriate email requesting that I take down the little informational banner/link of the MCSD logo (above left) which is linked to the Mesa County Sheriff's website for the sole informational, educational and journalistic purpose of facilitating public access to a public website. At that moment, the story became about Heather Benjamin and the logo. Of course it's pretty hard to write a story about a logo unless you engage in the 1st-Amendment-protected journalistic fair use of showing the public what the logo you are talking about looks like.

I'm still in the process of deciding whether or not to take the image down. But I need more information from Ms. Benjamin first. I'll get to the reasons why I believe my use of a low-resolution thumbnail-size image as an informational link to the MCSD website is perfectly legal in a minute. First I want to articulate my logic-based suspicion about what I would consider to be dirty tricks from the Matt Lewis camp.

ShareThis