What is an "Anarcho-Christian"?

Last night a lady asked me on Twitter, "What is an Anarcho-Christian?" (That's the word I used on my Twitter profile to describe myself.) I promised her I'd write an essay about it and get back to her with an answer. The question is important, because I believe the experience of history has proven that it takes an Anarcho-Christian culture to sustain a self-ownership-based social contract such as the U.S. Constitution. Otherwise, via the "slippery slope" doctrine, it inevitably morphs into police state tyranny — of which the United States has finally become a prime example. In the absence of an Anarcho-Christian culture, the so-called "noble experiment" that is human law and the U.S. Constitution are merely ignoble and tragic failures — even deceptions. This is why the Culture War for the soul of America is of such utmost importance.

Right off the bat, I would like to point out that neither theists (Intelligent Design) nor atheists (Random Conglomeration of Molecules) can "prove" diddley squat to satisfaction of the other side, so it's usually a waste of time to try. I like to just tell my atheist friends, let's pretend that theism (ID) and atheism (RCOM) are both unprovable fairy tales. What's in it for me to believe in the fairy tale with a sad ending? Nothing, as far as I can see, so I made a conscious choice to believe by faith in the fairy tale with the happy (life after death) ending because it makes my life happier.

ShareThis

The #SCDebate in the #Twitterverse - a tutorial on #SocialMedia in politics and freedom on the #Internet

I have written previously about Twitter, and how powerful and important I consider it to be to the cause of individual freedom and positive self-ownership-friendly cultural change. It is my view that Twitter has the power to promote free speech and individual freedom via the open and unrestricted dissemination and sharing of information in cyberspace. In that context, Twitter has the important potential to function as a two-way emergency warning system, a sort of modern-day Committee of Correspondence to get the news out to the citizenry in real time as to what shennanigans "the king" (government1) is up to.

I once heard an intelligent man say on YouTube that he believed an interconnected online community of so-called "citizen journalists" — in other words bloggers just like you and me — is the solution to putting an end to government1 secrecy and start exposing government1 corruption, deception, and lack of transparency and accountability in effective ways. That is so, because we are the ones who have the cell phones with cameras and recorders who happen to be in the right place at the right time when something newsworthy is happening. With that in mind, I thought I'd take a shot at writing a story folks might find interesting, kind of a "behind the scenes" version of the GOP primary debate in South Carolina. To do that, I wanted to use "tweets" (140-character posts) on Twitter to illustrate my story.

ShareThis

Why Janice Rogers Brown could help Ron Paul win the presidency

I think the reason it has been so long since my last post is that America's political1 processes have become disgusting, even repulsive. The politicians bashing away at each other is bad enough, but the cutesy and nasty ad hominem used by their wannabe-clever supporters against those who disagree with them on places like Twitter is enough to make a billy goat puke. Anyway, enough of the self-justification for procrastination and on with the point of this post.

Congressman Ron Paul is the GOP candidate I support for president in 2012. In stark contrast to the other candidates who give mere lip service to the U.S. Constitution, Ron Paul speaks and acts as if he truly believes the constitution is a binding specific-performance two-party contract which is not open to being unilaterally changed via strategic misinterpretation by one (the government) party to the contract. The other candidates act as if it's a corruption-friendly "living breathing" document amounting to little more than a shapeless pile of unintelligible socio-political economic manipulation and rhetorical B.S.

ShareThis

To be civil, or not to be civil: that is the question

(NOTE: The video linked to the thumbnail image of Bill Maher below has been taken down by YouTube. But you can still read the transcript of Maher's remarks if you CLICK HERE.

I forgot where I found this sentence, but I love it: "If Christianity is about anything it is about the fact that the awakened consciousness of one human heart can change the entire course of mankind." I sincerely believe that. The question of when to be "civil" (courteous and kind) and when to be "uncivil" (blunt and confrontational) in discussing politics and political strategies is not an easy one. It is true that people never improve out of hatred, contempt and/or scorn; they improve out of love. It is also true that there are adamantly "reprobate" (Jer 7:27-30, Ro 1:28, 2 Cor 13:5-7, 2 Tim 3:8, Tit 1:16) "many-there-be-who-choose-destruction" or "scumbag1" individuals who have no intellectual curiosity, no intellectual honesty, and who delight in trying to destroy all that is good in the world for their own selfish purposes. In such cases, the question arises: should one attempt to "overcome evil with good" (Ro 12:21), in such an ineffective "namby-pamby" way as to merely enable the evil, or, per such scriptures as Amos 5:15, Isa 5:20, Lu 17:3, Pr 28:23, Eph 5:6-7, Eph 5:11, Gal 6:7-9 and 1 Thes 5:21, should one rebuke the evil openly and bluntly so that it may be plainly seen and understood by those who have not yet made up their minds which path they want to follow (or align themselves with "politically2"?

ShareThis

If you believe in Rule of Law, then start helping defend the U.S. Constitution against the federal government!

in

America's economic crisis is multi-faceted. Probably the biggest part of the problem is cultural, in that an unsustainable percentage of the people have become "entitlement-minded". In other words, they want to live off of the "other guy's" labor which has been stolen and redistributed by dominant members of the human pecking order who call themselves "government". That "syndrome" is most clearly and frequently manifested by the race-hustler scammers when they say, "if you don't want to give me more of your money, you're a 'racist', 'bigot', 'homophobe', 'misogynist', 'hater', etc." Race-hustler scumbag1, Congresswoman Maxine Waters manifests the syndrome when she tells the Tea Party to "go to hell!" (You first, Maxine, dahling!) But another, maybe even bigger, part of the problem is general nation-wide ignorance about both the U.S. Constitution and its history, as combined with general ignorance regarding the history of U.S. Supreme Court decisions. That's a deadly recipe for the destruction of individual freedom.

ShareThis

Bible truth about money is being hidden from Christians by America’s 501c3 Pharisees posing as godly pastors

Dear Christian, please don't shoot the messenger just because the message may seem at first glance unpleasant to some. It has been my experience that silence does not remedy evil, to the contrary, silence enables evil. The maxim of human law is "Qui tacet, consentire videtur", which means "He who is silent is supposed to consent. The silence of a party implies his consent."(Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.) I specifically do NOT consent to the evil I am describing here. Because I believe history is full of great individuals who taught us that silence in the face of evil is cowardice, I am rebuking PROVABLE, DOCUMENTED evil, along with it's perpetrators, promoters and followers per Lu 17:3 and Pr 28:23, Eph 5:6-7, Eph 5:11, Gal 6:7-9 and 1 Thes 5:21, and exhorting them, per Heb 3:13 and Heb 10:24-25, to do better.

ShareThis

Why Big Brother hates the Internet: How Ed Schultz destroyed his journalistic credibility

Today was a great day for learning some of the lessons the Internet can teach us. Today, in a proudly in-your-face style, Andrew Breitbart outed talking head Ed Schultz for the propagandistic liar he proved today that he is. In my book, Ed Schultz lost 100% of whatever little credibility he had. Depending on how long it takes for MSNBC to fire Schultz, that network may also lose whatever little credibility they had. This in a time when various polls show media credibility at an all time low with "news" consumers.

Immediately below is Breitbart's video — it speaks for itself — which may prove to be the undoing of Ed Schultz. In my view, it couldn't happen to a more deserving piece of Goebbelsian propaganda scum1. Karma, Eddie, toujours le karma!

NBC News Caught Red Handed ‘Selectively Editing’ & ‘ Doctoring’ Video to Smear Gov Perry as Racist - MRCTV video

ShareThis

Death of free speech? The treasonous "law enforcement" bureaurats in Renton WA think so!

One recent glaring example of what egregious lengths various and sundry police-state scum1 are willing to go to deliberately violate the 1st Amendment and suppress dissenting speech is found in the following linked news stories and videos. Five of the offending cartoons, in addition to being linked, are also embedded below for viewing convenience. Some of them are also embedded in the linked Seattle Times article. It seems some fascist2 politicians3 and bureaurats are slow learners when it comes to freedom of speech, hence your humble webmaster's decision to help spread the story and hopefully facilitate their learning process.

Cartoonist Targeted with Criminal Probe for Mocking Police with Online Animation - MRCTV video

ShareThis

Lyndon LaRouche: Debt deal very similar to German law that put Hitler in power

On Lyndon LaRouche's website, it says, "Stop Obama's Hitler Coup." In an interview with Alex Jones, Lyndon LaRouche said that the debt deal passed by Congress is very much like the law passed in Germany that brought Hitler to power and made him chancellor, thus facilitating total dictatorship of one-man rule. In fact, this situation is even worse, because, by the words out of his own mouth (and his wife's, see the video below), Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born" citizen of the United States. He is therefore unambiguously disqualified from serving as President of the United States.

Lyndon LaRouche: Obama to Become 'Führer', Like Hitler Did on August 2 if Debt Deal Passes!! 1/4 - YouTube video

Under construction . . .

ShareThis

Australian economist, Steve Keen, Ph.D., Peter Schiff, and Professor George A. Selgin

Wow! Although I've been working steadily on the website, it's been almost four months since I posted a blog. That's probably due to all the yard work (greenhouse project) combined with all the manipulative and deceptive political rhetoric engaged in by both sides of the GOP/DEM duopoly. Recently most disgusting was the column by David Brooks titled "The Road Not Taken". Total B.S. The MSM appears to be "all in" on the "debt" fraud that is the current unconstitutional monetary system.

Be that as it may, I ran across an interview Max Keiser had with economist Steve Keen which inspired me to at least try to keep up with posting videos and articles I consider worthy of note. Hence the brilliant title of this post (hardee har har). Here Australian economist Steve Keen gives an extremely lucid lesson on Economics 101. He jokes that all economists (including himself) should commit harakiri. This is a genuine "must see" two-part interview for any person who wants to better understand the neofeudalistic "debt" fraud.

On the Edge with . . . Steve Keen (1/2) - YouTube video

Under construction . . .

ShareThis