Vaccine Aggregation

“If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls who live under tyranny.” ~ Thomas Jefferson

There are two main purposes for this aggregation of vaccine-related information: 1) for my own quick-reference use (as is the case with my other aggregations, and 2) to radically reduce online research time for any interested people who happen to stumble across this website. By making these kinds of aggregations, I don't have to spend nearly as much time searching for information which I might have forgotten to archive in my system of folders, files and bookmarks.

The truth about vaccines, Big Pharma and Big Medicine is the precisely the opposite of what most of us have been taught. Their intent has never been to cure the sick, but to create customers by treat symptoms with high-profit drugs. "Why is that so?" you might ask. It has been made possible because of the political language used by shamanistic Big Pharma and Big Medicine and their lobbyists in all three branches of neofeudalistic Big Government.

In his 1946 speech on political language, George Orwell said: "The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink. In our age there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia." "One ought to recognize that the present political chaos is connected with the decay of language, and that one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end. If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy. You cannot speak any of the necessary dialects, and when you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself."

Let's begin with some direct-language quotes:

“Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding.” ~ Ezra Pound

"I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." ~ Leo Tolstoy

"The medical establishment has become a major threat to health." "Modern medicine is a negation of health. It isn't organized to serve human health, but only to serve itself as an institution. It makes more people sick than it heals." ~ Ivan Illich (author Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health).

About Illich, The Lancet said, "Iatrogenesis was a centrepiece of his ideology, and he defined it at three levels. Clinical iatrogenesis was the injury done to patients by ineffective, toxic, and unsafe treatments that he listed in extensive footnotes. He described the need for evidence-based medicine 20 years before the term was coined. Social iatrogenesis resulted from the medicalisation of life. More and more problems were seen as amenable to medical intervention, with pharmaceutical companies developing expensive treatments for what he described as non-diseases. His most biting words were cultural iatrogenesis, the destruction of traditional ways of dealing with, and making sense of, death, pain, and sickness. He used the medical profession's own statistics to argue that many of the diseases over which doctors claimed victory were on their way out in the natural rhythm of things."

"The Truth, when you finally chase it down, is almost always far worse than your darkest visions and fears." ~ Hunter S. Thompson (Kingdom of Fear; pg. 220)

"Drug companies are not here to bring health to the population but to scam them on one level for vast amounts of money, by treating the symptoms and not addressing the cause." ~ Sir William Osler, M.D. (1849-1919)

“Vaccines are biological weapons. Period. That’s what people have to wrap their head around.” ~ Rebecca Carley, M.D.

“I had no clue about vaccines. I believed all the propaganda I was taught in medical school.” “Once I realized from all my research – which is going on sixteen years now -- that this is no accident. Vaccines are bio-weapons. They cause all the diseases in internal medicine, including death, almost all shaken babies, infant vaccines, so the parents get charged with murder after the doctors have murdered their child, etc, etc. That's when I decided I have to cause the death of medicine. That's my goal anyway. Big goal, and it hasn't made me a lot of friends amongst the white coats. But, you know, the good news is that there's natural solutions for everything, and these natural solutions are being covered up by Big Pharma which totally controls medical education.” ~ Rebecca Carley, M.D.

“Stay away from the doctors. Don't get vaccines, don't get their drugs, and you'll be fine.” ~ Rebecca Carley, M.D.

(DISCLAIMER: America's corrupt police-state government1 would probably want me to repeat the disclaimer I found on another "alternative wellness" website: "All information presented on this web-site is for educational, entertainment, and historical purposes only. It is not intended to diagnose or treat any illness or medical condition. Never forgo seeing a doctor when ill. Most are skilled diagnosticians and know what works to treat illnesses, especially acute ones. Even minor health problems can quickly become life threatening if not treated or treated improperly. It is a lot easier to rebuild from a round of prescription medicine than from unchecked infection. complementary health measures are for prevention, failure of conventional treatment, or as an adjunct treatment with permission of your health professional." "This Web site contains links to Web sites operated by other parties. Such links are provided for your convenience and reference only. We are not responsible for the content or products of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site." Having done my "legal" duty, let me say that I have always despised the type of wannabe-politically2-cutesy immoral scum3 who believe they are somehow entitled to use the coercive/violent power of One Ring "government1" to create monopolies and captive markets with which to artificially, and very fraudulently, increase the value of their own time and labor relative to the time and labor of the rest of humanity. To permanently settle the hash of two such groups of scum3 will, in my opinion, require a Judicial Reform Amendment and a Freedom of Self-Medication Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.)

Ladies and gentlemen of the public opinion jury, I want to borrow from the syntax of the Declaration of Independence to explain why “a decent respect [for] the opinions of mankind requires that” I “should declare the causes which impel” me to such blunt language in presenting my case and demonizing various anti-constitution, anti-self-ownership, anti-self-medication cutesy pies.

I like to ask the question: “If you and your criminal cronies could legally counterfeit money, how long would it take for your group to own everything real in the world?” Unfortunately, most “normal” people don't understand the ramifications of allowing an anonymous cabal of transnational central banksters to create infinite amounts of fraudulent interest-bearing digital legal-tender “money”. The oligarchs and their political-class toadies can (and do) create whatever amounts of computerized musical-chairs monetary numbers it takes to buy whatever amounts of corruption they want at whatever levels of government they need it to stay in power and control and “engineer” society to their liking and personal financial benefit – and to everybody else's detriment. This type of dangerously psychopathic criminal scum are self-evidently anti-constitution, anti-self-ownership, anti-self-medication.

To combat such an extreme level of political manipulation, it is necessary to polarize society around an issue. For example, blacks-as-chattel slavery was not abolished until John Brown said in effect, “we are going to start killing slave owners until slavery is abolished.” Of course he was hung for his moral courage and insight. According to Wikipedia, "After the Civil War, Black leader Frederick Douglass wrote, 'His zeal in the cause of my race was far greater than mine — it was as the burning sun to my taper light — mine was bounded by time, his stretched away to the boundless shores of eternity. I could live for the slave, but he could die for him.'" Brown was an expert in polarizing politics. As a result, the Civil War was fought, an estimated 750,000 Americans died, and blacks-as-chattel slavery was abolished.

The embarrassing fact is, true progress in medicine has always, without exception, been violently resisted by medical “authorities” who cling to the erroneous beliefs of their time. For example, there were huge fights about whether or not doctors should wash their hands before assisting in childbirth right after they had worked on some bacteria-laden autopsy.

The sad fact is, in defense of freedom, SOMEBODY has to speak up and “tell it like it is” in blunt, transparent and accountable language before any political candidates will have the courage to run for office using the same blunt, transparent and accountable language to publicly discuss the important issues of the day and affect meaningful political change.

Lots of world-class doctors and scientists know that what I have said is true, but lots of them are too afraid to say anything because they will lose their funding and/or medical licenses for daring to go against the Big Pharma, Big Medicine and Big Banking establishments. So they tolerate the lies in deference to retaining their livelihoods.

Therefore, I made a fully-informed decision to say exactly what I have said to stimulate free and open public discussion of the crucial core issues of self-ownership and self-medication. The idea is to polarize the politics of the "Big Pharma/Big Medicine vs the fundamental constitutional right of self-medication" struggle. Hopefully a violent civil war can be avoided with sufficient polarization of the issue.


When the level of evil in an irreconcilable political conflict is so extreme that violence seems inevitable, plain, direct, blunt, transparent and accountable speech is necessary if there is to be any rationally realistic hope of avoiding violence. Hence this brief discussion of speech-related law. The idea is to polarize the politics of the "Big Pharma/Big Medicine vs the fundamental constitutional right of self-medication" and the "Police-state-control vs free speech" struggles. Hopefully a violent civil war can be avoided with sufficient polarization of the issue. I believe the most extreme rhetoric which is still "legal" is necessary to effectively combat the Hegelian-Dialectic manipulations of the alpha psychopaths who own and control the world and who, being anti-self-ownership, anti-constitution, do not want the peasantry to self-medicate and/or to restore the U.S. Constitution to its rightful place as Supreme Law of the Land. Hence the rough language and rhetorical brinksmanship.

The neofeudalistic Hegelian-Dialectic scum (aka "alpha psychopaths") who own and control the world, and who constitute the elite of the transnational debt-as-money oligarchy, are so evil, and so intransigent in their evil, that there is no way they will voluntarily give up their criminally usurped power. Under those sad circumstances, it is necessary to discuss AS AN ABSTRACT IDEA/PRINCIPLE the subject of political violence. However, corrupt deserving-of-death government scum are daily attacking the fundamental 1st Amendment rights of free thought and free speech. They pretend that speech is "sedition", "threats", "hate", "disorderly", "obstruction", etc. In the historic 200-500-year cycle of violent human revolutions and "civil wars" (an oxymoron), the so-called "little people", less well-educated in the skills of deception, manipulation, demonizing and Hegelian dividing-and-conquering, just get frustrated and angry and want to pick up their pitchforks and baseball bats and "storm the Bastille". The reason for this phenomenon is the truism that the powerless destroy their enemies by shooting them, while the powerful destroy their enemies by using their corrupt courts and police to do the job.

So, what is the law about what you can and cannot say when abstractly and hyperbolically discussing the sorts of Hegelian scum who need to be killed before the U.S. Constitution can be restored to its rightful place as the Supreme Law of the Land and peace and prosperity on Earth can be at long last realized? Precisely because there are so many political prisoners who were not "nuanced" in their understanding of the law regarding the limits of free speech in America when addressing the political issue of deserving-of-death scum, I thought a brief tutorial on Free Speech 101 seemed appropriate.

According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the 1st Amendment protects advocating the violent overthrow of government AS AN ABSTRACT IDEA. See Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949), Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957), Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973).

In a free society, there must of necessity be a bright, inviolate line between ACTION/BEHAVIOR and THOUGHT/SPEECH. Government may deal with the former, but if the society is to be free, the latter must forever be beyond the power of the dominant members of the human pecking order who love to deceptively call themselves "government". Government, for its own nefarious purposes, always and inevitably tries to increase its own power by muddying and obfuscating the clear line between speech and actions. Citizens who wish to remain free will vigilantly combat such "legal" obfuscation.

The Founders were very well experienced with tyranny and the alpha psychopaths who implement/impose it on the various citizenries of the world. As a consequence, the core purpose of the 1st Amendment is so that citizens can gather and publicly say in effect, "the king is a corrupt piece of garbage who needs to be killed", without being attacked by the king's corrupt politicians, judges, prosecutors and police. What you are not allowed to do is to speak or "conspire" in such a way as to constitute a "clear and present danger", per Schenck v. U.S., 249 U.S. 47 (1919) (See also Goldman v. U.S., 245 U.S. 474 (1918), Abrams v. U.S., 250 U.S. 616 (1919), Frohwerk v. U.S., 249 U.S. 204 (1919), Debs v. U.S., 249 U.S. 211 (1919), Pierce v. U.S., 252 U.S. 239 (1920), Schaefer v. U.S., 251 U.S. 466 (1920), Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951)). In other words, you can't say something like, "let's all meet at Joe's house at midnight, pick up our guns and go over to Mr. Politician X's house and kill him." The current state of 1st Amendment case law does not protect that type of speech -- of course it does pretend that burning a flag is "symbolic speech". Go figure. I guess if you are intellectually dishonest enough you can pretend that some speech is action and some action is speech. If you happen to be alpha-psychopathic oligarchical scum, I guess you need that "legal" flexibility to make controlling the peasantry easier.

Naturally, the king's corrupt lying politicians, judges, prosecutors and police will always label freedom lovers as "haters", "racists", "terrorists", "bigots", "homophobes", "cop haters", "anti-government", "tax resisters", etc. The idea is for the corrupt king and his corrupt vassals to use the "justice" "system" to suppress dissent and destroy effective political opposition with wannabe-clever slogans, jingles, platitudes and public relations manipulation and control without every getting to the specific facts/merits of any given situation. It's quite clever, actually.

I made this little "Free Speech 101 vs. Constitution-hating 'law' enforcement" tutorial as the foundation for explaining my reasoning and feelings in the "Incompetent Parenting vs THC Kills Cancer" public relations war. I'm tired of political cutesy-ness and wanted to raise the level of rhetorical brinksmanship in the interests of polarizing an issue of life-vs-death importance: the politicization of health care. I wanted to lay a foundation for supporting the dog I have in this hunt. I wanted to lay a foundation for saying: "AS A MATTER OF ABSTRACT POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY/PRINCIPLE, I believe every constitution-hating useful idiot who prefers politicized medicine to scientific medicine, and every constitution-hating useful idiot who would use the violence/coercion of government to prevent me from growing naturally occurring Creator-made plants in my back yard, then processing those plants into cancer-killing (THC-based) medicine, then rubbing that cancer-killing (THC-based) medicine on my two spots of Basal Cell Carcinoma, from a moral, spiritual, logical, constitutional, self-ownership, self-determination and constitutional point of view deserves to be killed. AS A MATTER OF ABSTRACT POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY/PRINCIPLE, any person who is so ignorant, so immoral, and so control-freakish that they actually want to use the violence/coercion/power of "government" to prevent me from medicating myself as I see fit, to heal myself and achieve a state of wellness via my own research and experimentation on my own body, very richly deserves to be killed in spiritual, moral, intellectual and physical self-defense.

In a situation where government scum were secretly working on weaponizing dangerous viruses in the 1950s and then, by accident or otherwise, spread LIVING cancer-causing monkey viruses (e.g. SV-40) to tens of millions of Baby Boomers via polio (and other) vaccines, then tried to cover up that "national security" secret with criminal (my opinion) Richard Nixon's propaganda-based "War On Cancer" designed to make trillions of dollars for Big Pharma, Big Medicine, Big Cancer, Big Banking and their cronies, I believe the vehemence of my dissenting attitude is politically necessary and more than amply justified from both moral and intellectual points of view.

Having said that, let me be crystal clear that, as a 70-year-old teetotaller who is trying to maximize his lifespan by researching nutrition and medical alternatives, and as a person who reads U.S. Supreme Court opinions for a hobby, I am neither naive enough, gullible enough, or stupid enough to try to grow cancer-curing cannabis plants in my back yard before I believe the public relations war against cannabis prohibition has been for all intents and purposes mostly won. Let me also be crystal clear that I have absolutely no intention of implementing violence of any kind against anti-constitution scum, as numerous and ubiquitous as they may be. What I wanted to be crystal clear about is what the law regarding free speech is, and what the level of my moral outrage against politically-cutesy, disordered, neofeudalistic anti-constitution control freaks is. I have ZERO spiritual, moral and/or philosophical tolerance for any anti-constitution scum who would rather force me to die of some disease than to change their "useful idiot" thinking, acquire more knowledge, and start helping the cause of self-ownership, self-determination, individual freedom and the U.S. Constitution.

(NOTE: Article 2, Section 10 of the Colorado Constitution says in pertinent part: “Freedom of speech and press…every person shall be free to speak, write or publish whatever he will on any subject, ... and in all suits and prosecutions of libel the truth thereof may be given in evidence, and the jury, under the direction of the court, shall determine the law and the fact.” See also the legal disclaimer for this website.)


Vaccine Information Network

Vaccine Liberation - "Mission Statement: To reveal the myth that vaccines are necessary, safe and effective; To expand our awareness of alternatives in healthcare; To preserve our right to abstain; To repeal all compulsory vaccination laws nationwide."

United Patients Alliance

Think Twice Global Vaccine Institute


Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health ~ by Ivan Illich

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

Marijuana, The Forbidden Medicine, by Lester Grinstone

The Pot Book: A Complete Guide To Cannabis, by Julie Holland, M.D.

The Screwtape Letters, by C.S. Lewis

The Kingdom of God Is Within You, by Leo Tolstoy

The Federalist, by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay


SHAMELESS SELF-PROMOTION: See John's Twitter for one of the web's most eclectic mashups of interesting real-time news articles. I surf the web for interesting real-time news stories and informative tidbits so you don't have to.

Crucifying the Vaccine Heretics ~ by Roman Bystrianyk

The Endocannabinoid System: We Are Born With It - The Arrow of Truth - The Video

Why Doctors Die Differently - Wall Street Journal

Ed Griffin on the Politics of Health and Health Freedom - YouTube video

Catherine Austin Fitts-China the Big Concern, Not U.S. or Dollar - YouTube video

War On Health -- How Pharmaceutical Companies Slaughter Tens of Thousands of Americans Each Year - YouTube video

The Truth About the Drug Companies Lecture - Dr. Marcia Angell - YouTube video

What The Drug Companies Won't Tell You with Dr. Michael Murray - YouTube video

War on Health - Gary Null's documentary exposing the FDA - YouTube video

Autism - Made in the U S A - Gary Null's Remarkable Documentary - YouTube video

Scientific Research and Real Facts about the Cannabinoids in Cannabis - YouTube video

The Verdict - Paul Newman - Courtroom Summation - YouTube video


1. In reality, there is no such real thing as "government". It is not a rock, a tree, a river, or even a cloud. It is mere behavior, an established social order, a dominance-based pecking order. With other animal species, it is often called "dominance hierarchy". In the case of humans, the term "social hierarchy" is more often used. As Frédéric Bastiat said, "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." As H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." As General Smedley Butler has written, "War Is A Racket". In reality, "government" is merely the dominant individuals in the inherently evil and inevitably corrupting stupid-human pecking order struggle known as "politics"2. These disordered-by-definition dominant individuals merely call themselves "government" so the hoi polloi masses will view them as being intelligent enough and moral enough to follow and obey.

2. Always remember, "politics" = person or group A trying to persuade person or group B to obey the will of A, most frequently for the personal financial benefit of A and to the personal financial detriment (higher taxes) of B. In other words, "politics" = manipulation. That is why deception = the so-called "art" of politics. That is also why "politician" = professional deceiver, and why "political" = deception-based, or having to do with deception. Everybody is competing for political power to steal labor and money out of the "other guy's" pocket and put it in their own. Politicians get votes by promising to be all things to all people. Because that is a physical impossibility, most of their promises of necessity get broken. Because they know this in advance, they are ALL liars to one degree or another. The king is always the most corrupt person in the kingdom. (The first two kings of ancient Israel, Saul and David, were murderers.) In my opinion, any person who sincerely wants to be the king is criminally insane and an implacable deadly enemy to the inalienable Creator-endowed rights of individual freedom and self-ownership.

3. It bears constant repetition: explaining the words "scum" and "scumbag" as an epithet used in self-defensive demonization against select individuals and/or ideologies. Hey, what can I say? It is a long-proven statistical fact that negative political ads are in fact effective. And since the so-called "left" uses lies, half-truths, demonization and the politics of personal destruction as standard political strategies, failure to engage in a little "turn about is fair play" merely makes it easier for the various assortments of disordered illiterate fascist control freaks to destroy individual freedom. As I said on my blog homepage, "Some folks just think they're smarter than everybody else, a higher form of life than everybody else. So, instead of engaging in good faith discussions about specific ideas, they simply resort to deception, sophistry, unspecificity, undefined terms, manipulation, demonization and the politics of personal destruction AS A MATTER OF PREFERRED STRATEGY to get their little spoiled-brat control-freak way. Such behavior is anathema to intellectual honesty, an open mind, a kind heart, free inquiry, the freedoms of thought and speech, and the free flow of information. It MUST be eternally warred against if humankind is to entertain a realistic hope of ever reaching its full spiritual and intellectual potential." To avoid the violence which is directly related to repression of free speech and the crushing of polite and civil discourse, I believe it is essential to engage in strategic tit-for-tat with wannabe-clever manipulative demonizers by openly calling them what they are: the anti-freedom, anti-Golden-Rule scum of the earth (aka "scumbags"). Accordingly, it doesn't bother me in the least to do so. No less brilliant a person than Jesus of Nazareth himself referred to the scumbags of his day as "hypocrites", "blind guides", "vipers" and "whitewashed sepulchres". To paraphrase Ann Coulter, Jesus was not some moron driving around in a Volvo with a "be nice to people" bumper sticker on it. So, having read The Art of Political War and Other Radical Pursuits by David Horowitz, I don't have any problem with calling "scum" what it is. Surely a huge majority of people, especially black people, would agree that any person or group who sincerely believes in slavery or pedophilia, by way of example, qualify as "scum". Point made.

Under construction . . .

Vaccine140.png25.11 KB
VaccineThree140.png38.06 KB
BabyWithNeedles.png299.47 KB