Promoting steal-and-redistribute socialism under the pretense of "anti-racism" = PURE EVIL

Article 12 of Chapter 1 of the 1936 Constitution of the USSR, titled "The Organization of Soviet Society" reads: "In the U.S.S.R. work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: 'He who does not work, neither shall he eat.'" That's the "atheistic", or "secular", version of the axiom.

In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the "theist", or "religious", version of that same principle is codified in such Bible verses as Ge 3:19 and 2 Thes 3:6-10.  

So even under "pragmatic" Leninist-Stalinist socialism, the "noble" Soviet experiment in groupthink collectivist economics had not attained the "higher phase" of a truly "enlightened" communist society promoted by Karl Marx's philosophy as manifested by the famous quote attributed to him, "In a higher phase of communist society ... only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be fully left behind and society inscribe on its banners: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." — In Selected Works, vol. 2 (1942). Critique of the Gotha Programme (1875).

The latest rage (and it's a maddeningly outrageous one) is to promote steal-and-redistribute socialism under the pretense that if you're not in favor of socialism as a sustainable economics scheme for society, then  you are by definition a racist.

Here's how the strategic logical fallacy, the deliberately fraudulent and manipulative false premise, works:

"I am a minority/woman/homosexual, therefore I am automatically a victim of white men between the ages of 18 and 65 because they are by definition evil racist/misogynist/homophobic (take your pick) perpetrators. So give me your money, Whitey/Bubba/Homophobe (take your pick), or you're a racist/misogynist/homophobe (take your pick). If you don't agree with me that steal-and-redistribute fascism/socialism/communism (take your pick) is a wonderful idea and a long-term sustainable economics scheme for American society, then you are by definition automatically a  racist/misogynist/homophobe (take your pick). Vote for Obama or you're a racist. If Obama loses, America is a racist1 country." This crap is worse than sick and manipulative. It's pure undiluted evil.

The pathetic, too-ignorant-to-belong-in-the-conversation types (many of them registered Democrats) who actually believe the above false premise behave as if they didn't believe empirically observable and provable laws of Nature — you know, petty, inconsequential stuff like Gravity, E = mc2, the Pythagorean theorem, Newton's laws of motion, Charles Law, Boyle's Law, the law of conservation of energy, etc., etc. — even exist. The  truth is, whether we like it or not, whether the steal-and-redistribute scammers like it or not, the immutable cause-and-effect laws of Nature do NOT depend on human opinion for their existence, power, and gravitational force and effect. They are what they are, and they work how they work. We ignore them at our peril: if you step off a cliff, gravity will break your body on the rocks below.

Simply and accurately put, Nature's first two immutable cause-and-effect laws of economics are:

1) Whatever you tax (e.g. honesty, integrity, industriousness, generosity, education, good parenting, wellness, prosperity, constructive life choices, etc.), you WILL GET LESS of, and

2) Whatever you subsidize (deception, corruption, laziness, greed, ignorance, bad parenting, unwed motherhood, sickness, poverty, destructive life choices, etc.), you WILL GET MORE of.

If you pay someone $500 and give them the option of either 1) working for it, or 2) NOT working for it, and pretend that both options are morally equivalent, your human guinea pig will inevitably choose the free (not worked for) money — EVERY time. It's basic Human Nature 101. That's the "secular" version. In the "religious" version of the same thing, the Apostle Paul called it man's "old nature". No matter in what language you articulate the principle, per Nature's second law of economics, if you subsidize non-working, then you are going to get more non-working. It's EXACTLY that simple and clear.

This is a TOTAL no-brainer, folks. The Leninist-Stalinist experiment in socialism has been an unqualified and absolute failure everywhere it has been tried. It's basic Economics 101 and shouldn't have to be endlessly repeated for the self-evident truth of it, the cause-and-effect logic of it to sink into the average human brain: you are NOT a racist just because you oppose Stanlinist-Leninist socialism and don't want to vote for Barack Obama. The claim is so deliberately manipulative, so deliberately outrageous that, in my book, its promoters define themselves as wannabe-clever, race-hustling speech-Nazi scum. At that point I have no interest in anything else they have to say until such time as they come to believe a  a sincere and abject (non-face-saving) apology is appropriate.

Barack "Something for nothing" Obama says that people who don't want to pay more taxes are "selfish". But there is nothing new under the sun about Dalai Bama's "Change" Nirvana-Utopia: it's a political scam, an economics fraud, and a historically common and undistinguished one at that.

Here's the scoop: I am neither a racist, nor selfish, nor have I ever been either. Additionally, I don't have much money. I don't have even remotely more than my "fair share" of money. If I were a whiner like Obama's fans, I could say I am a senior citizen, a victim, a Social "Security" dole-ite, and a diabetic who must shoot insulin. But none of that is relevant to the fundamental intellectual honesty of my point. Like tens of millions of other ordinary decent, hard-working, common-sense Americans, I just don't like to be taxed extra by manipulative touchy-feely narcissists who want to pay a person who won't work and doesn't pay taxes $500 for his vote, so he can vote to have his Big Brother in the Nanny State government continue to steal and redistribute ever-increasing amounts more money for ever-increasing amounts of non-work and ever-increasing numbers of self-destructive life choices.

Society (an "economy") is like a wagon being pulled down a road. The more people who quit doing the work of pulling and opt for jumping into the wagon and riding for free, the slower the wagon will go, until so many people have quit working that the wagon will stop altogether.

Lying politicians and their advisors (such as James "Snake Head" Carville) are easy to understand: they're genuine mentally ill (some narcissistic, some sociopathic, some just plain greedy), addicted to inherently evil and inevitably corrupting One-Ring (political) Power Over (the "other"). They will say anything, make any false promise, steal and redistribute any amount of wealth, make any smoke-filled-room bargain with the devil, build any "bridge to nowhere", register any dead voter, to buy enough votes to gain possession of the One Ring and keep it.

The folks who are much harder to understand are the dummies who so ignorant that they sincerely believe you can play with fire forever without getting burned. In other words, the so-called "liberals" who think they are so special, so clever and such a higher form of life than everybody else that they can ignore the empirically provable laws of nature and "tweak" things just enough to get what they want without paying the cause-and-effect consequences: "OK, so what if the power to tax is the power to destroy. Maybe we can 'tweak' the tax code just enough to get what we want (political power via social engineering) without any harm being done. Maybe we can reward nonwork and bad life choices just barely enough so we can make a pile of money for ourselves to put in our secret Swiss bank accounts without causing so many people to stop working and go on welfare that it hurts the overall economy."

Well, I've got some bad news for the steal-and-redistribute2 control-freak power mongers: 1) they are playing with fire3, 2) the ends do NOT necessarily justify the means, 3) there is no right way to do a wrong thing, and 4) there is no smart way to do a stupid thing. That's why the Founders wrote the 2nd Amendment4 into the Bill of Rights: it's a preventative against tyrannical out-of-control government. It's a cure, if you will, a medicine, an antidote which, as Thomas Jefferson5 so aptly noted, needs to be taken from time to time for a constitutional republic and its attendant virtues of self-ownership6 and self-determination to remain healthy and vibrant.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, "All experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government." What that means to me is that we can mess around with the stupid ideas of steal-and-redistribute socialism/fascism/communism/neo-feudalist, and we can shout at each other, demonize each other, and vote for our favorite lying politician. BUT there are four indispensable things that gravitate toward individual freedom which we MUST NOT allow to be take from us if Liberty and Justice are to survive: 1) Guns, 2) Cash, 3) Juries, and 4) the Internet.

We have already seen the "long train of abuses" by the jackboots in government in such events as the murders and coverups of JFK, RFK, MLK, Ruby Ridge, Waco, Oklahoma City, TWA 800, 9-11, Building 7, along with too many others to name. At whatever point in time Big Brother finally screws up his courage and decides to outlaw EVEN ONE of those four precious individual-freedom facilitators, it is time for "The Rumble" to begin! No warning, no threats, no more talk, no quarter asked or given, just direct action.

As Liam Neeson said in the movie "Michael Collins", "I hate them for making hate necessary." Along with millions of other people, I believe the human species is capable of better than our current crop of lying politicians.

FOOTNOTES:

1. Coincidentally, two people just came to the door (@ 11:30 a.m. - 11/2/08) asking if we had voted yet. I told them "yes" but that I wouldn't tell them who I voted for because I didn't like what is being done with polls. Nowadays, polls aren't for information. Polls are being used by people with  agendas to create the story they want to propagandize the public with. "My" pollsters were Obama workers. One was a tall and very pretty young black woman with medium-length dreadlocks, the other an aging hippy-type male in a Pete Seeger hat and worker's blue shirt. I treated them courteously. I told them I was tired of people shouting at each other over a political election. I told them I didn't know even one person who didn't like other people because of their skin color. The lady told me "It's [racism] out there. When I was canvassing out in California, I met quite a few people who didn't like me because of my skin color." What can one possibly say in response to that? "Oh, Geez, I apologize for my race?!" Races are not monoliths. Even if what she said were true, it is utterly irrelevant to the immutable laws of economics and a level color-blind free-market playing field composed solely of willing sellers and willing buyers. I'd say "my" two pollsters were completely clueless in the subject of economics. They actually said we need to get the money out of politics! I presume they meant that all politics should be taxpayer-funded. Obviously, they didn't understand that it's impossible to remove the money from politics without simultaneously removing free speech because people vote with their money. Apparently they are hardcore socialists. They also sincerely believe that if Obama doesn't win, America is a racist country. That worries me because, nice as they seemed, I'm afraid they are the kind of people who will make a Second Civil War (this time socialism) inevitable in America. Either that, or a neo-feudalistic New Dark Ages which would last until the evils of fascist slavery are no longer sufferable. Oh well, I can't control all that, so it doesn't matter. It only matters that I do my best to spread the Truth — (remember, "truth" = existence/reality) — of Nature and Nature's Creator to the economics-challenged hoi-polloi.

2. "Socialist", "communist", "fascist", "neo-feudalistic", "liberal", "conservative" — whatever. The so-called "liberals" want to steal your labor directly by using the police powers of the state to enforce by terror confiscatory taxation. The so-called "conservatives" want to steal your labor by using the police powers of the state to pass special-interest legislation which financially benefits them personally along with their corporate benefactors, friends, families, apologists and fellow travellers. This is the great deception of the narcissistic control-freak fascist/neo-feudalist: first s/he uses simplistic and misleading collectivist (socialistic and/or communistic) arguments of police power to justify wealth redistribution and appeal to the indolent, the greedy, the unfortunate, and the altruistic for votes; then, having prevailed in the arena of public opinion and acquired the power to redistribute wealth, s/he steals it from the taxpayer and uses capitalistic free-enterprise liberty and property rights arguments to put the lion's share of the loot into his own privately owned corporate and bureaucratic pockets. Such practice is exceedingly clever, to be sure — even clever enough to fool some lawyers, politicians and courts who have apparently given little thought to economics and the natural laws of justice — but the practice is not so clever as to be entirely invisible to the people, and it is guaranteed in the end, as predicted by Justice Brandeis in his famous Olmstead dissent, to precipitate a terrible retribution.  This is so because the safety and welfare of the WHOLE public is harmed by the deception.

3. ""Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." — George Washington

4. The 2nd Amendment means that the individual has the right to defend himself, especially against despotic dictators and kings. See District of Columbia et al. v. Heller, No. 07-290 (2008).

5. "The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." — Thomas Jefferson

6. Self-ownership includes the absolute right to own your own body and your own labor, along with the absolute right to defend yourself against any aggressor who wants to steal it from you by violent fear-based tactics such as armed robbery or taxation. But I repeat myself.

In simpler times, a more intellectually honest Supreme Court said:

"An ACT of the Legislature (for I cannot call it a law) contrary to the great first principles of the social compact, cannot be considered a rightful exercise of legislative authority . . . A law that punished a citizen for an innocent action, or, in other words, for an act, which, when done, was in violation of no existing law; a law that destroys, or impairs, the lawful private contracts of citizens; a law that makes a man a Judge in his own cause; or a law that takes property from A. and gives it to B: It is against all reason and justice, for a people to entrust a Legislature with SUCH powers; and, therefore, it cannot be presumed that they have done it." — Chief Justice Samuel Chase in Calder v Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dallas) 386 (1798)

"It was said by Chief Justice Marshall, in the case of M'Culloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316 (1819), that the power to tax is the power to destroy . . . To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen, and with the other to bestow it upon favored individuals to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes, is none the less a robbery because it is done under the forms of law and is called taxation. This is not legislation. It is a decree under legislative forms." — Mr. Justice Samuel Freeman Miller in Citizens’ Savings & Loan Ass’n v. City of Topeka, 87 U.S. 655 (1874).

It is important to undertstand that this first great principle of the social contract has never been changed in accordance with the due-process-of-law procedure set forth in Article V of the U.S. Constitution. It has only been changed via deception-based abusive "interpretation" of the U.S. Constitution under the "living-breathing-document" theory of constitutional interpretation by lying revisionist-history judges. See The Big Lie (an essay I wrote which is posted on this website), and a plethora of books by respected lawyers such as "Men In Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America", by Mark Levin (ISBN-10: 1596980095, ISBN-13: 978-1596980099), "Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws", by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano (ISBN-10: 1595550402, ISBN-13: 978-1595550408), and "The Dirty Dozen: How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom", by Robert A. Levy and William Mellor (ISBN-10: 1595230505, ISBN-13: 978-1595230508).

The only responses Obama fans, socialists, communists, fascists, various sophist nitwits, and too many "liberal" Democrats, have to this kind of historically accurate information are nonsequiturian ad hominem, deliberately and strategically false accusations of "hate", "intolerance", racism, misogyny, homophobia, lunacy, conspiracy theorist, wearer of "tinfoil" hats, etc. The vermin who make such politically motivated accusations, purely AS A MATTER OF STRATEGY, are truly evil. They are the real haters, the real dividers (see Gal 5:20), the real stealers — (according to Abingdon's Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, (ISBN-10: 0687400333, ISBN-13: 978-0920413975), the Greek word "andrapodistes" meaning "menstealers/enslavers" in 1 Tim 1:10, and Greek word "döulös" meaning "slave" in 1 Cor 7:23) — of the "other guy's" labor, the real purveyors of anti-Golden-Rule intolerance for any ideas but their own. They are the real whacko, control-freak, reprobate, tyrant-minded scum who make hate necessary for self-defense and survival because they make all meaningful dialogue impossible. That's the so-called "secular" version. In so-called "religious" language, the same cause-and-effect principle has been articulated as, "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!" (See Isaiah 5:20.)

In keeping with the spirit and intent of the prophets of old and the biblical exhortation to hate evil (Amos 5:15), I say, "Woe unto those who call steal-and-redistribute socialism 'freedom' and/or 'equality'!" May they either 1) repent and change their ways, or 2) roast in the hottest part of hell, right along with their soulmates, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Saddam!

ShareThis
AttachmentSize
Hammer & sickle 1 160 pixels.jpg45.41 KB
Karl Marx - wax museum 1 160 pixels.jpg55.21 KB
Barack Obama 1 159 pixels.jpg46.33 KB
Jesse Jackson 1 160 pixels.jpg30.22 KB
Vladimir Lenin 1 160 pixels.jpg35.66 KB
Joseph Stalin1 160 pixels.jpg32.07 KB
Big Brother 1 160 pixels.jpg40 KB
James Carville 7 160 pixels B&W.jpg35.82 KB
Constitution 1 300 pixels.jpg65.83 KB
Gloria Steinem 1 160 pixels B&W.jpg39.96 KB
Barney Frank 1 160 pixels B&W.jpg36.94 KB